Goodreads Facebook Twitter RSS Feed

The Best of Abyss & Apex Volume 1 published

Thursday, 23 April 2009




The Best of Abyss & Apex Volume 1 has been published today. This anthology contains my short story Museum Beetles, along with 30 other fine and wonderful works of speculative literature. The book is available on Amazon and is obviously highly recommended.

It's already had some great reviews, for example :

"Consistently extraordinary"
- Booklist
"A high-quality collection"
- The Fix
"Innovative and captivating"
- Ilona Andrews

I also like this quote from The Fix's review, which I've quoted before but which bears repeating :

“Museum Beetles” by Simon Kewin has an unusual narrative structure, following a succession of museum curators over generations. It appears at first glance to be about the growth of a beetle colony over that time, and their gradual destruction of the museum and its records. But in fact, there is another narrative arc here, and it is leading to the point where the people inside the museum will understand something new about their situation, and see a new possibility for their future. The reader, of course, makes the same discovery, and Kewin judges the reveal to perfection. This is beautifully written, fascinating, and one of the highlights of the book.

So - grab your copy today!

www.simonkewin.co.uk

Tuesday, 21 April 2009

I spent a bit of time today tweaking and enhancing my main web site - simonkewin.co.uk. I know, I know, I'm supposed to be writing. In my defence, I have done some of that too ...

One thing I've done is to add another story to the archive of my previously published short stories and poems. Now Earthworks is there too. This is a slipstreamy story that originally appeared in Nemonymous 2. It's a story about birds, geometry and being allergic to the modern world. It has some lines in it that still make me smile.

I've also added buttons to let people leave a tip/donation if they like what they read in the archive. It's probably optimistic to think that many people will, but you never know. I see it is an experiment. It's probably what would be called "monetising". I'm always keen to try out these neologisms ...

Back Up Your Writing

Monday, 20 April 2009

Over the years, I've come across writers who don't back up their work. I've had professional writers ask for help because their computer has gone wrong and they've lost some vital manuscript. In the old days BC (before computers) not backing-up was perhaps understandable. Copying a document by hand is laborious and time-consuming. Mediaeval monks devoted their lives to it. These days, if you use a computer to compose or edit what you write, losing a document is unforgivable. Writing is hard and the words you get down are precious. But backing up what you write is very easy. No-one should lose work in this way.


What you need is a backup that happens automatically. Backing up manually - remembering to copy files to a CD every now and then for example - is too hard. You inevitably forget, or miss out files. The backup is never as reliable as it should be. Besides, remembering to do simple, repetetive tasks like this is what computers do best. In fact, that's pretty much all they do. So if you're not currently backing up, set it all up now and then you can get on with the creative stuff, secure in the knowledge that you're covered in the event of disaster.

In fact, I think what you need are two separate backups. Partly this is for extra security. Mainly it's because they each solve slightly different problems. Neither is particularly tricky to set up. Within an hour or so you can have them both in place. And crucially, they will both be automatic.


Local Backup

This means keeping a copy of all your work on another drive, computer or device to which your computer is directly attached. So, something at your home or office. The point of this is to let you quickly and easily get a document back if you accidentally wipe its contents or delete it. It's easily done. But having a local backup means a potential disaster becomes nothing more terrible than finding your backup copy and restoring it over the original.

So, what you need is a place to put your backup and some software to maintain it. At a pinch, you don't need to buy any extra hardware. You could just back everything up to another folder on your computers hard drive. But a second drive of some kind is preferable. That way you're covered if your hard drive develops a fault, or if your computer suddenly stops working. If you have two computers networked together in some way, that's ideal. Do a cross-backup so that the important files on each are backed up to the other. Or you could buy an additional hard disk solely for the purposes of backing up to. I use an external USB drive. You pretty much just plug them in to a spare USB socket and you're done.

A writable CD or DVD is another option but I wouldn't recommend them myself. They tend to be fiddly and unreliable, although they're better than they used to be. Plus you have to faff around with the discs, making sure you put the backup one in after listening to some music, say. Too fiddly. A perfectly good option is to use a memory stick/USB thumb drive. Again just plug one into a spare USB socket and you're sorted. Memory sticks have become incredibly cheap of late, and incredibly capacious too. At the time of writing you could pick up a 2 gigabyte (GB) drive for a few pounds. It wouldn't do for backing up pictures or video but for written documents it's ideal. 2 GB can store a 100,000 word novel a couple of thousand times over. A memory stick is also portable - you can easily take it with you if you're worried about your computer for some reason.

As to software, you just need something that can maintain a copy of your files on your backup device. You just tell it where you keep everything - My Documents, say - and it will automatically backup new and amended files. There is a lot of such software about. Some of it is free - e.g. Microsoft's SyncToy. You just need to configure it once and you're sorted.

With all these approaches, be careful about making changes to the backup copy of a file rather than the original. If you're not careful, you could end up losing changes when the original is automatically copied over the (changed) backup. You can set up more complex synchronisation schemes so that you can make changes on either side, but it can get fiddly. Best to only make changes to the originals.

Another thing to be aware of is that, if you change an original file without realising it, then the unwanted change will just automatically be copied to your backup and you could lose work. You can get round this by configuring the software you use to keep multiple copies of the backed-up files. So, as well as the current original, it would maintain a number of previous versions. This can be handy, too, if you decide you want to pull something out of a previous revision that you had discarded. You decide you want a certain phrase or rhyme back, for example, in which case you can just open the relevant backup, copy out the bit you want, and paste it back into the current version.


Remote Backup

I'd advise also setting up a remote or off-site backup. Having everything local is handy, but if disaster strikes, if your machine is stolen, say, or damged by water or fire, then the chances are you'll lose your local backup too. Set up an automated remote backup and you're completely covered. Getting files back from a remote location is harder, but at least you can be sure the files still exist in the event of disaster.

These days, there are many web sites offering online backups. In the past I've used Mozy and Carbonite, but there are plenty of others. Typically they backup your documents in the background when you're online. So you really need broadband. Some offer a free level of service for a capped amount of backup - for example, you can get 2GB of free offsite backup. You just need to sign up, download the software, configure as instructed and that's it. So long as you place new documents in the configured folder, anything you write will be securely backed up - locally and remotely.


Testing, Testing

It's probably the software developer in me, but the other thing I'd recommend doing is testing everything works once you've got it set up. Create a new document and/or amend an existing one and, once the relevant backup process has had chance to run, you should see the change appearing in your backup. If you can't, something is wrong.

The other thing to check is that you can get files out of the backup successfully. It's incredibly common for people to skip this. It's not unknown for people to only discover they can't retrieve files when disaster strikes - by which time it's too late.


If you don't currently back up what you write - i.e. if you're just hoping that you won't have a hardware failure or some other problem - then you need to sort out a backup now, before disaster strikes. It isn't tricky to set up. And it's certainly a lot easier than retyping everything you've ever written ...

Book Review : Brisingr by Christopher Paolini

Wednesday, 15 April 2009



It's going to be hard not to mention the "T" word when talking about this book. I'll try really hard.

This is run-of-the-mill high-fantasy, skilfully written and entertaining enough to read. It draws freely on all the tropes and clichés of the form, to the extent that you really have to admire Paolini's chutzpah in producing it. This is a book that contravenes no end of writing advice I've seen over the years, for example. There is mediaeval language. There are elves and dwarves. There is the Dark Lord. There are impossible quests and magical items. Which is all well and good, of course. You might as well criticise a murder mystery for having a murder victim. But still, you can't help wishing for something more original. And to be fair, Paolini is aware of the need to transcend what has gone before. He works hard on giving us believable characters who have strong doubts about the violence they are caught up in. At one point he pokes fun at the whole "named magical sword" phenomenon in fantasy. There are admirable attempts to get away from black-and-white depictions of good-guys and bad-guys. Still, the book never really breaks out of its mould.

This volume in the cycle sags rather, compared to the previous two. Paolini explains he has taken the time to explore his characters more. Again, this is all well and good, but sometimes not enough is happening. You reach page 200 and, apart from a daring rescue, you've really just had people chatting to each other. About weighty matters, sure, but still just chatting. At other times, the book flares into life. The political machinations of the various dwarf clans, for example, is great.

I have to mention the invented words and phrases - "Du Vrangr Gata", "Agaetí Blödhren" etc. etc. Sometimes they work. But sometimes, frankly, they're just a bit embarassing. Curse those Az Sweldn rak Anhûin!

Go on then, I'll say it. Sub-Tolkien. Enjoyable and readable but still sub-Tolkien fantasy.



The YouWriteOn 5000 ... The Last Word

Monday, 13 April 2009

Readers of this blog will be bored of the whole YouWriteOn/Legend Publishing 5000 saga - I know I am - so I promise this is (almost certainly) the last post on it.

To summarise the story so far: YouWriteOn offered to publish 5000 novels by Christmas 2008, but, in my case at least, completely failed to. I met all their requirements for manuscript format but heard nothing back. For months I got no sense out of them - just automated responses and emails saying "we'll get back to you". Many of them in amusingly poor English. When they eventually did manage to send an informative email, it was to admit they'd cocked up, lost my manuscript etc. etc. By this time, I was so disillusioned with the whole venture I was no longer interested anyway.

Now I've had another email about their "next set of free publishing". They've clearly learned from some of their mistakes and have come up with a vastly less ambitious figure of 500 books this time around. So that's something. But they don't apologise for their disastrous first attempt at the deal. Rather, there were, they say, "a number of success stories" (what number?) They do admit to "a number of huge challenges caused by the unprecedented level of demand". What on earth does this mean? It was they that set the figure of 5000, not the poor writers. Quite bizarre.

But, even if their previous shoddiness and inability to communicate hadn't already put me off the whole venture I'd be having second thoughts anyway. This time around everything feels much more commercial. It feels like it has clearly crossed the line into vanity publishing. I mean, it was always open to accusations of this. Now, the distribution service (£49.99) is "recommended". And the manuscript revision service costs £49.99 again - or £99.98 for manuscript and cover art. The offer has gone from an "Arts Council" scheme to help authors to something that feels like a rip-off.

What's more, I've been reading posts like this one on the How Publishing Really Works blog, in particular what it has to say about giving away "precious" first rights to a book. Now, it feels like YouWriteOn's ineptitude has been a blessing in disguise. I've come full circle and I'm glad they couldn't fulfil their promises. As How Publishing Really Works say, "it’s better to not be published at all than to be published badly".

So, I won't be submitting Hedge Witch to YouWriteOn's new scheme. I'll stick to conventional agents and publishers. And actually, there's a glimmer of hope here. An agent has requested sight of the completed manuscript of the book after reading the first three chapters. Nothing may come of it, of course, but it feels like progress, and very exciting progress at that.

If you happen to be considering taking up YouWriteOn's offer I'd say be very, very wary.

More Reader Feedback

Thursday, 2 April 2009

... on my poem recently published on Bolts of Silk :

"Lovely concept, lovely poem"

"Love this, especially all the s sounds"

"I really like the image of 'furled e in serene'"


Which is all very pleasing. I must send more to Bolts of Silk. Not that I write that much poetry. But the the whole reader/writer community seems to work well there.

Book Review : The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini

Wednesday, 1 April 2009




I must be the last person in the world to read this book - but it is wonderful and I'm glad I did. What strikes me with it is not so much the way in which Afghanistan is realised, nor the beauty of the writing nor even the shocking brutality of the Taliban, but, really, the skill with which the simple fundamentals of writing good fiction are employed. Narrative tension is very well set-up and maintained. Secrets and lies are left buried and then years pass by so that we long to find out what has happened to the characters involved. These are simple, basic tricks, of course - but the real skill comes in making it all seem natural. In the reader not noticing s/he is being tricked.

This is not perfectly done - there are too many annoying little cliff-hangers and coincidences that sometimes spoil the illusion - but it is done sufficiently well for the novel to remain utterly compelling (as blurb writers say.) For me, the theist message towards the end of the book grated and spoiled the effect too. But still, highly recommended. I must read his next book soon.